Vote for Islands of Myth on Top Mud Sites

	--all groups---misc-jokesjunkmudconobscene-mud-generalgeneral.eqpartyideassalespraiseequipment_wishesalt.snazzy.equipment.tune.tune.tune-guild-guild.abjurerguild.acrobatguild.druidguild.elementalguild.evokerguild.martial_artistguild.necromancerguild.lurkerguild.psychicsguild.shapeshifterguild.unravellerguild.warriorguild.weaverguild.woodsman-notice-informplayer.bugsplayer.typoschanged_equipment-client-clients.portalclients.miscclients.tfclients.zmud
firstprevious1	nextlast
closed bug: 10715 Sat Aug 1 03:56:21 2009 MST Iru wizard offline =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Report Number: 10715 Original bug report by Einar on Mon Nov 26 19:42:16 2007 Object: Unknown Creator: Unknown Room: /domains/blackavar/necrocity/cemetary/rooms/underground/1,1,1 In reference to report: 10711 You only cannot id a gem by its color if there are 2 in inventory. i.e. having 1 gem, insert gold gem into key will work, but 2 in inventory will return: You can't insert that into that. However it will work when you realize they are multiples and use: insert a gold gem into key Maybe change the message so instead of giving a bad syntax message (You can't insert that into that.) And have it go to the normal (Which gem do you mean? (try using proper english like: 'a', 'any', 'first' ..) or something along those lines) At least something to realize you have multiple gems of the same color, as your inventory will group them as: (7) Gem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Vor wrote on Tue Nov 27 05:45:58 2007 that sounds like a parser error, not a bug that i can fix personally. might not really be a bug at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Zifnab wrote on Tue Nov 27 10:55:12 2007 I would like to see this happen. I will try and reproduce it when i get to work. I have never seen the parser do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Zifnab wrote on Tue Nov 27 13:42:38 2007 ok I misread this morning. It does appear to be a parser issue it is taking the message from indirect_verb_rule or can_verb_rule instead of realizing it has 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Iru wrote on Sat Aug 1 03:56:21 2009 I doubt anything will change about it because no one is capable of doing so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Iru wrote on Sat Aug 1 03:56:21 2009 Closed
firstprevious1	nextlast