| Immalinga | Sun Sep 12 12:08:33 2010 MST |
| 2 hours approx for 3 pieces of eq? Seems a bit out of whack that the
effort required with 4 blasters does not reap anywhere near the
reward of other lengthy mobs
ox |
| >Immalinga | Mon Sep 13 23:48:14 2010 MST |
| Feel free to not kill it then. |
| >>Immalinga | Tue Sep 14 07:49:29 2010 MST |
| to be fair, there is a difference between people whining that
something is too hard and that it should be made easier cause they
can't beat it and people whining because a monster is incredibly
boring to fight, though easy as hell.
my personal opinion of immalinga was the same. the monster was
absolutely no challenge other than the challenge of staving off
boredom while the blasters sat there chaining blast spells. i don't
think having a monster take ages to kill is really a challenge. i'd
love if immalinga was a quicker kill and given something to
challenge the party. |
| >>>Immalinga | Tue Sep 14 15:53:09 2010 MST |
| On Tue Sep 14 07:49:29 2010 Venetian wrote post #617:
> something is too hard and that it should be made easier cause they
> can't beat it and people whining because a monster is incredibly
> boring to fight, though easy as hell.
>
> my personal opinion of immalinga was the same. the monster was
> absolutely no challenge other than the challenge of staving off
> boredom while the blasters sat there chaining blast spells. i don't
> think having a monster take ages to kill is really a challenge. i'd
> love if immalinga was a quicker kill and given something to
> challenge the party.
I vote we take the sunnydale route
People don't like this mob.
Remove it and it's gear from the game |
| >>>>Immalinga | Wed Sep 15 09:20:44 2010 MST |
| On Tue Sep 14 15:53:09 2010 Korthrun wrote post #618:
> On Tue Sep 14 07:49:29 2010 Venetian wrote post #617:
> > something is too hard and that it should be made easier cause they
> > can't beat it and people whining because a monster is incredibly
> > boring to fight, though easy as hell.
> >
> > my personal opinion of immalinga was the same. the monster was
> > absolutely no challenge other than the challenge of staving off
> > boredom while the blasters sat there chaining blast spells. i don't
> > think having a monster take ages to kill is really a challenge. i'd
> > love if immalinga was a quicker kill and given something to
> > challenge the party.
>
> I vote we take the sunnydale route
> People don't like this mob.
> Remove it and it's gear from the game
i completely agree with korthrun, we should put sunnyvale back
in-game. i mean, he makes several good points for it in the post.
and also it would give most of the active p-base a nerdgasm. |
| >>>>>Immalinga | Wed Sep 15 09:26:20 2010 MST |
| On Wed Sep 15 09:20:44 2010 Pyromaniac wrote post #619:
> > > think having a monster take ages to kill is really a challenge. i'd
> > > love if immalinga was a quicker kill and given something to
> > > challenge the party.
> >
> > I vote we take the sunnydale route
> > People don't like this mob.
> > Remove it and it's gear from the game
> i completely agree with korthrun, we should put sunnyvale back
> in-game. i mean, he makes several good points for it in the post.
> and also it would give most of the active p-base a nerdgasm.
p.s. the sunny gear was removed from the mobs, since the area was
removed, but the eq already in game stayed. So remove imma, i have
the pieces i need ;) |
|
