| Switching to secondaries | Thu Nov 19 22:15:56 2009 MST |
| since bodies have a time limit on them, it'd be cool to do the same
between switching to secondaries
that way daneel's idea of switching to help others has it's own repercussions
well.. daneels "rule", that way nobody is considered multi-playing
so if someone has a registered secondary and they switch they have a
time-limit to switch between
and if they don't register said secondary and do so they get
punished accordingly
seeing as no punishment has been seen since and there's no
favoritism on that part |
| >Switching to secondaries | Fri Nov 20 10:19:53 2009 MST |
| On Thu Nov 19 22:15:56 2009 Illusions wrote post #300:
> since bodies have a time limit on them, it'd be cool to do the same
> between switching to secondaries
> that way daneel's idea of switching to help others has it's own
repercussions
> well.. daneels "rule", that way nobody is considered multi-playing
> so if someone has a registered secondary and they switch they have a
> time-limit to switch between
> and if they don't register said secondary and do so they get
> punished accordingly
> seeing as no punishment has been seen since and there's no
> favoritism on that part
I completely disagree with the idea of putting switch time between
secondaries. It takes SO much more work to build up a secondary than
it does a split body that there should be absolutely no punishment
in any form (especially wait time) to switch.
Just my two cents. I'm very pro-wait time for switching bodies, but
absolutely not for secondaries.
Q |
| >>Switching to secondaries | Fri Nov 20 16:14:06 2009 MST |
| On Fri Nov 20 10:19:53 2009 Quillz wrote post #304:
> > punished accordingly
> > seeing as no punishment has been seen since and there's no
> > favoritism on that part
> I completely disagree with the idea of putting switch time between
> secondaries. It takes SO much more work to build up a secondary than
> it does a split body that there should be absolutely no punishment
> in any form (especially wait time) to switch.
> Just my two cents. I'm very pro-wait time for switching bodies, but
> absolutely not for secondaries.
> Q
Precisely, it would really make having secondaries mean having a new
character name and nothing else. |
| >>>Switching to secondaries | Fri Nov 20 16:16:03 2009 MST |
| On Fri Nov 20 16:14:06 2009 Highpriest wrote post #305:
> On Fri Nov 20 10:19:53 2009 Quillz wrote post #304:
> > > punished accordingly
> > > seeing as no punishment has been seen since and there's no
> > > favoritism on that part
> > I completely disagree with the idea of putting switch time between
> > secondaries. It takes SO much more work to build up a secondary than
> > it does a split body that there should be absolutely no punishment
> > in any form (especially wait time) to switch.
> > Just my two cents. I'm very pro-wait time for switching bodies, but
> > absolutely not for secondaries.
> > Q
> Precisely, it would really make having secondaries mean having a new
> character name and nothing else.
with how some people treat their secondaries, how would that be wrong hp? =) |
| >Switching to secondaries | Fri Nov 20 16:45:31 2009 MST |
| I see no reason to do this. All your doing is shifting the possiblilty of cheating from helping self to not registering. A secondary is a completely seperate character & can be use to help others if there is NO benefit to the primary. |
|
