| shadows | Tue May 19 02:01:22 2009 MST |
| I have noticed that when stretching shadows..... you dont always
know who else is a lurker
so if they walk into a room.. you cant see your.their shadows
just like necro's. bag.pets. druidpets... i think our shadows shoudl
be visible and even namable
that would make everything much easier for stretching and splitting
purposes i think
right now its just crap. that i can be working on my shadows
and becuase nailman. roirraw, mikkiz or any other lurker walks in
the room they are automaticaly having their shadows placed in front
of me.
i was here first...
so that i dont argue..
just make it please to where shadows are more like pets...
considering i spend more sps.eps.my time.. on my shadows than
druids.. and some necros do.
thanks |
| >shadows | Tue May 19 05:52:11 2009 MST |
| sorry, didn't mean to mail that to flick.
Name_shadow, name_shadow, shadow_name, or shadow_Name should work.
so for flick name would be flick and Name would be Flick. i dunno
which of the 4 works, but i'm 99% sure one of them will. |
| >>shadows | Wed May 20 02:41:06 2009 MST |
| On Tue May 19 05:52:11 2009 White wrote post #14:
> sorry, didn't mean to mail that to flick.
> Name_shadow, name_shadow, shadow_name, or shadow_Name should work.
> so for flick name would be flick and Name would be Flick. i dunno
> which of the 4 works, but i'm 99% sure one of them will.
a shadow of user, 2nd shadow of user, 3rd shadow of user, etc. that
does work (tested it). |
|
